Description
Stack-based buffer overflow in the WinACE UNACEV2.DLL third-party compression utility before 2.6.0.0, as used in multiple products including (1) ALZip 5.51 through 6.11, (2) Servant Salamander 2.0 and 2.5 Beta 1, (3) WinHKI 1.66 and 1.67, (4) ExtractNow 3.x, (5) Total Commander 6.53, (6) Anti-Trojan 5.5.421, (7) PowerArchiver before 9.61, (8) UltimateZip 2.7,1, 3.0.3, and 3.1b, (9) Where Is It (WhereIsIt) 3.73.501, (10) FilZip 3.04, (11) IZArc 3.5 beta3, (12) Eazel 1.0, (13) Rising Antivirus 18.27.21 and earlier, (14) AutoMate 6.1.0.0, (15) BitZipper 4.1 SR-1, (16) ZipTV, and other products, allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in an ACE archive.
Affected products
Version statuses are supplied by the assigning organization. Consult the original record for detailed ranges and platform conditions.
n/a n/a
n/aaffected
References
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26982 ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016512 ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-24/advisory ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2824 ↗
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/49 ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19884 ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26479 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1797 ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434279/100/0/threaded ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1014863 ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016011 ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016115 ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19939 ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-46/advisory/ ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016065 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1835 ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016088 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3495 ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19967 ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-27/ ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016177 ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016114 ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26272 ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-50/advisory/ ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/432579/100/0/threaded ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19931 ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-36/advisory ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-28/advisory ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26447 ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19975 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1775 ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/16479 ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26385 ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26116 ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/436639/100/0/threaded ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1611 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1681 ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433693/100/0/threaded ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2184 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1577 ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-33/advisory/ ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-29/advisory/ ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434234/100/0/threaded ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19938 ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19581 ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26302 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1694 ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20270 ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19890 ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19977 ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26142 ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-38/advisory ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19596 ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-41/advisory/ ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016066 ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/440303/100/0/threaded ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19458 ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-25/advisory ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016012 ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26736 ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-32/advisory/ ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19454 ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433258/100/0/threaded ↗
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2006-30/advisory ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26315 ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/432357/100/0/threaded ↗
- http://www.osvdb.org/25129 ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27763 ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19834 ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434011/100/0/threaded ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/28787 ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433352/100/0/threaded ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/20009 ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26480 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2047 ↗
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26168 ↗
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14759 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1836 ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1016257 ↗
- http://secunia.com/advisories/19612 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1565 ↗
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1725 ↗
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1015852 ↗
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=112621008228458&w=2 ↗