{"id":"CVE-2011-5094","state":"PUBLISHED","title":"Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL ","description":"Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment","publishedAt":"2012-06-16T21:00:00.000Z","updatedAt":"2024-09-16T21:56:51.299Z","severity":null,"assigner":"mitre","products":["n/a n/a"],"affected":[{"vendor":"n/a","product":"n/a","versions":[{"version":"n/a","status":"affected"}]}],"references":["http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html","http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html","http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html","https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065","http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html","http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2","http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html","http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html","http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html","http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"],"weaknesses":[],"ingestedAt":"2026-10-29T19:40:08.334Z","source":{"repository":"CVEProject/cvelistV5","path":"cves/2011/5xxx/CVE-2011-5094.json","commit":"556c9d3a8cd17e218bb8e452ba7cd619a384ff47"},"raw":{"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.1","cveMetadata":{"cveId":"CVE-2011-5094","state":"PUBLISHED","datePublished":"2012-06-16T21:00:00.000Z","dateUpdated":"2024-09-16T21:56:51.299Z","assignerShortName":"mitre","assignerOrgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","dateReserved":"2012-06-16T00:00:00.000Z"},"containers":{"cna":{"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment"}],"affected":[{"vendor":"n/a","product":"n/a","versions":[{"version":"n/a","status":"affected"}]}],"references":[{"url":"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"]},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html","name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"]},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html","name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"]},{"url":"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2","name":"[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"]},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html","name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"]},{"url":"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"]},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html","name":"[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"]},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html","name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"n/a","lang":"en","type":"text"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"shortName":"mitre","dateUpdated":"2012-06-16T21:00:00.000Z","orgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca"},"tags":["disputed"],"x_legacyV4Record":{"CVE_data_meta":{"ASSIGNER":"cve@mitre.org","ID":"CVE-2011-5094","STATE":"PUBLIC"},"affects":{"vendor":{"vendor_data":[{"product":{"product_data":[{"product_name":"n/a","version":{"version_data":[{"version_value":"n/a"}]}}]},"vendor_name":"n/a"}]}},"data_format":"MITRE","data_type":"CVE","data_version":"4.0","description":{"description_data":[{"lang":"eng","value":"** DISPUTED ** Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment."}]},"problemtype":{"problemtype_data":[{"description":[{"lang":"eng","value":"n/a"}]}]},"references":{"reference_data":[{"name":"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"},{"name":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"},{"name":"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"},{"name":"[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"},{"name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"},{"name":"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"}]}}},"adp":[{"title":"CVE Program Container","references":[{"url":"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html","name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html","name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2","name":"[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html","name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html","name":"[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html","name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"]}],"providerMetadata":{"shortName":"CVE","orgId":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","dateUpdated":"2024-08-07T00:23:40.220Z"}}]}}}